Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of Canadian elections

Timeline of Canadian elections
(Self nomination) Tompw (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Wikipedia's best work: Provides information in a format that cannot be found elsewhere on the internet.
 * 2) Useful, comprehensive, factually accurate, stable, and well-organised:
 * 3) * Useful: Provides a summary of results of 426 provincial, territorial and federal elections since Confederation (or creation). The vast majority (396 out of 426 - 93%) of election links are bluelinks.
 * 4) * Comprehensive: Covers all general elections provincial, territorial and federal elections since Confederation (or creation).
 * 5) * Factually accurate: references given, neatly organised by area.
 * 6) * Stable: Will be only be updated (on average) every few months.
 * 7) Well-organised: Easy to find any required information; split into 40-year sections.
 * 8) Uncontroversial: no edit wars or disuptes
 * 9) Standards / style manual: Layout is clear and concise as is reasonably possible.
 * 10) Images: N/A - no images


 * Support. Incredible work. Complete, clear visual layout, parallel chronology of all elections. I already use it as a reference. dh ▪ 2¢ ▪ 10:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. There are still a few red links, but this is a great summary list, complete, well organised, well referenced. Good work. --Qyd 17:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong support Extremely well-done, and as the nominator points out, everything one would like to see in an FL. -- Kicking222 18:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * support good list Hmains 05:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. There just seems to be a space between the "NU" and "Federal" columns, otherwise an excellent list.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   17:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's intentional. Tompw (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't see any need in it, if there is a width problem you can adjust the width of the table in percentage.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   18:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's there to seperate the Federal from the provinvial/territorial elecions. Tompw (talk) 19:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Isn't the normal line seperation enough? I still fail to understand why it's useful for the list.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   19:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It was just there to make the federal "extra" seperate. It's not a big deal... if you thik it should go, change it. This is a wiki, after all :-) Tompw (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I understand. Sorry for going "too much into details".  Michaelas10   (Talk)   21:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Great list, very complete and informative. -- Wizardman 18:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)