Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the Adriatic campaign, 1807–1814


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 21:24, 27 December 2008.

Timeline of the Adriatic campaign, 1807–1814
Hi, I've been working on this for months, but I think its finally ready. This is a tricky one, and I haven't seen anything like this elsewhere on Wikipedia, let alone at FLC, so its slightly virgin territory. As described at the top, the timeline covers the events of one specific campaign on the left, contextualised with important events in the wider Napoleonic Wars on the right. Hopefully this article fulfills the criteria. (Redlinks are being steadily filled in by myself and another editor and should be mostly completed in a couple of weeks.)--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought I had, but somehow I neglected to thank User:Rama for his assistance with French ships, officers and sources.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * This link is redirected to page, which needs a "Subscriber Login" to view the content. I suggest you archive the page at WebCite to prevent problems like this. Regards, Canniba  loki  02:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This seems a little unethical. They have the subscriber login for a reason and to bypass it in this way doesn't sound like it conforms with Wikipedia's policies on copyright etc.--Jackyd101 (talk) 13:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments from - a great article - some minor things in the three minutes I have...
 * I'd prefer to see citations in numerical order, so instead of [10][9] I'd prefer [9][10].
 * "1 April, A small ..." - presumably that should be a small a to be grammatically correct? Same with the numerous other instances of similar.
 * Sorry I can't spend more time on the article which is actually very interesting! The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 06:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Both done, thanks for the comments.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 *  Conditional Support - the template located below the image interferes with the prose. The words run across the template, which shouldn't occur. If that's fixed, I'll support because the rest of the list meets WP:WIAFL.SRX 16:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you have any idea how to achieve this? I'd be happy to do it but I can't work out how!--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I tried playing with it, but I got nothing. Since this is a navbox and not an infobox, it should go at the bottom of the list anyhow, which will eliminate this problem.--SRX 18:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it should, these are not ordinary navboxes but military campaignboxes designed to go at the top of the article which is where anyone looking would expect to find them (see the other articles listed for examples). I'll keep trying to find this out.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Until then I can't support because it does not comply with WP:WIAFL Cr 6.--SRX 19:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, but I'd like to know how to fix this, perhaps you can point me to the relevant guidelines? Anyone else able to pitch in on this issue?--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You can see whether WP:NAVBOX or WP:CLN have anything on this matter.--SRX 22:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've looked but its not clear as I'm not clear on what is wrong (there is no overlap on my screen resolution). Thus I've asked for feedback from a more experienced user and we'll see if he can help out.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

(outdent) I am not experiencing overlap either. SRX, what screen resolution are you using? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It must be my screen then, since it is a 1440 x 900.--SRX 22:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. Other than the issues listed above, I think I have dealt with eveything that has been raised.--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support After reading it a few times, "in which" is probably the best choice. Also, your explanation on cruiser makes sense, so I have no more comment on that issue.  Nice work, I always liked the timeline lists!  « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @  17:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.