Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tokio Hotel discography


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:15, 17 January 2009.

Tokio Hotel discography
I am co-nominating this with User:AngelOfSadness; it is her first FLC nomination. We think it comparable to other Featured discographies. All comments will be addressed. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I happily co-nom this article with Matthewedwards as for reasons already mentioned. It is quite comprehensive as it lists all official releases, known certifications/chart positions etc., all of which is easily verifiable through the reliable sources cited and I believe it meets the WP:WIAFL critera. Cheers. AngelOfSadness  talk  16:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - my comments were resolved to meet WP:WIAFL.--Truco 22:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Quick comment: those "year in music" (like 2008 in music) links are unnecessary. I think they should be removed. For eg: 2005 in music doesn't even mention Tokio Hotel. indopug (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * done - AngelOfSadness  talk  15:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Spell out lesser-known abbreviations such as SNEP and ORF.
 * What makes http://www.disqueenfrance.com/certifications/video.asp?forme_certif=19&annee=25 a reliable source?
 * The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry links to the Société Civile des Producteurs Phonographiques site (http://www.scpp.fr/SCPP/), which is the French company that collects royalty payments for artists when their songs are played on the radio, tv, or purchased. They link to Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique, which on the front page says:"Créé en 1922, le Syndicat National de l'édition Phonographique regroupe 48 membres dont il est le porte-parole et le représentant, vis-à-vis du Gouvernement, des parlementaires et de l'administration, que des autres organisations professionnelles, de la presse et du public." My French isn't too good these days, but basically its been around since 1922, and is made up of 48 members including the Government, Administrative Parliament, the press, public and other professional organisations. DisqueEnFrance.com is the official site.Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * What makes http://www.tokiohotelamerica.com/2008/12/25/gold-in-italy/, a fan club site, reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * They claim to be the official US fan club website, but I've replaced it with the offical Italian Tokio Hotel website. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The link checker shows that several links are dead. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just fixed them. Hopefully the new links are working ok. AngelOfSadness  talk  19:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * They do, but now some other things have turned up.


 * Spell out lesser-known abbreviations such as ORF and SNEP.
 * Done Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)


 * Refs 43 and 48–58 needs publishers. Some of those also need the  parameters filled in. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)

Support:
 * The country names in the title shouldn't be in bold
 * done - fixed
 * I don't believe this is correct. The country names are part of the table header, and should be bolded. I am yet to see a table with unbolded headers. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)
 * At first I wasn't sure about it but many other Featured discographies have the countries unbolded like Foo Fighters discography, Goldfrapp discography, Nine Inch Nails discography and 50 Cent discography so I changed it as all of the ones I checked were unbolded. AngelOfSadness  talk  17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * {{nowrap|IFPI (Austria): 2× Platinum → AUT: 2× Platinum
 * Not done yet as I don't have to fix all of them at the moment but I'll fix them within the next 24 hours if no one else has fixed it in the meantime.


 * Maybe add catalog numbers?
 * done - added to all studio, video and live albums
 * Personally, I don't feel these add any encyclopedic value, but since it's been done - meh. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)
 * I added them as suggested in WikiProject Discographies/style where all catalog numbers should be added (only for albums and only if they were notable releases). The Discography more than proves that the releases are notable so they were added. AngelOfSadness  talk  17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Album → Album details
 * done


 * US → U.S.
 * done
 * I'm reverting this per WP:MOS. Since "UK" is used, "US" must also be used - It is never "U.K.", otherwise "U.S." would be okay. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)
 * Just for clarification, either can be used; however, U.S. is more prevalent, especially in American English. Since this article doesn't seem to use American English and does not concern an American subject (not sure which variant is used), there seems to be no reason to change. I know I said otherwise earlier, I was wrong. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The article uses British English and British date formatting. "US" is much more common in the UK, because "UK" is never "U.K.". MOS actually says "never add periods" (MOS):{{blockquote|text=In American English, {{xt|U.S.}} is the standard abbreviation for {{xt|United States}}; {{xt|US}} is becoming more common and is standard in other national forms of English ... If the abbreviated form of the United States appears predominantly alongside other abbreviated country names, for consistency it is preferable to avoid periods throughout; never add periods to the other abbreviations ({{xt|the US, the UK and the PRC}}, not {{xt|the U.S., the U.K. and the P.R.C.}}).}} Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As an article's spelling and grammer/punctuation use is based on where the subject is from I was unsure which one was more correct in this case. But, looking at it MOS links provided by Mattewedwards, US is actually correct. AngelOfSadness  talk  17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Single → Song
 * done


 * Everything should be organized as it appears in the infobox
 * done
 * No, because it splits the "music" section up by sticking the "videos" part in between. I've put this back. It's an issue with the infobox, not the page layout. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email)


 * Director → Director(s)
 * done


 * Music video → Title
 * done


 * Music video titles shouldn't be in italics
 * done


 * In the Other appearances section:
 * Song title → Song
 * Release → Album/Single
 * done


 * DVDs → Video albums
 * done

-- Underneath-it-All (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * AngelOfSadness talk  21:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.