Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Musical/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 18:29, 27 December 2012.

Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Musical

 * Nominator(s): HesioneHushabye (talk) 19:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list status because I am interested in making lists better on Wikipedia and would like feedback on this one. I feel this list is clear, concise, and gives potential readers what they are looking for.

Thanks! HesioneHushabye (talk) 19:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Strong oppose list is nowhere near featured standard, suggest you withdraw and look at other featured lists, specifically those based n the Tony Awards to get an idea of what we ask for. Some problems are: NapHit (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Lead is far too short, would expect at least two decent sized paragraphs
 * no references, so information is completely unsourced
 * table does not meet MOS:DTT and is not accessible
 * User:Albacore/Tony should be of note here. Albacore (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Especially this much better version — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of this, the nominator appears to have ownership issues with these pages. Also I think it is reprehensible to blank a page that is in an editors own page. Suggest this is withdrawn immediately and the user takes on board the fact that Albacore's version meets our criteria, whereas this does not. NapHit (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I like that you mentioned this is a better version, when it doesn't even have a lead, and has less information (no character names/no win/nomination totals. I can add more of a lead to it, because I know about theatre, unlike Albacore, who has explained they have no interest in the material beyond adding it to their many FL lists. Compared to how it was before this I started editing the list, which took several days. I have asked Albacore to leave this list alone as there are many others that are worse that need to be re-done. HesioneHushabye (talk) 04:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but you have no right to tell anyone not to edit a page. Albacore is free to edit whatever page he likes, this is also another example of ownership issues on your part. This is not the place to discuss this, take it to the talk page. The list is nowhere near featured standard, a lot of work needs to be done and I'm not sure you comprehend just how much. NapHit (talk) 07:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Strong oppose
 * The list is nowhere near FL standards. To start off there are two tags at the top of the page which needs addressing. There are multiple issues with the table as pointed out by other reviewers. I'd suggest the nominator to withdraw the nom as a lot of work is required to bring this list to FL standards. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  11:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.