Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Triple Gold Club


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 06:36, 21 February 2009.

Triple Gold Club

 * Nominator(s): Scorpion 0422 

Oh boy, my first nom with this fancy new preload template. Anyway, sourced, WikiCup entry, will address concerns, etc. For those who may think the current table is too cluttered, there is a sample version that lists only the first year the player won that accomplishment here. Enjoy. -- Scorpion 0422  16:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, my issues have been resolved, I won't support just yet because this nomination has only been open a short time and I'd prefer to wait to see if any other reviewers find a cause to object. Congrats for your excellent work. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  23:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support, No major issues have been raised in the other reviews. I can now confidently support this nom. Well done. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  16:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments from  - Excellent list overall.
 * Lead


 * The club has been described as a "a modern fraternity" because prior to 1977 NHL players—considered professional—were not allowed to play in the world championships or Olympics, which were intended for amateur players. - comma after 1997
 * Done.
 * Swedes Niklas Kronwall, Mikael Samuelsson and Henrik Zetterberg needed the least to join the club, measuring from the time of their first victory of one of the three championships, winning the Olympics and World Championships in 2006 and the Stanley Cup in 2008 (as members of the Detroit Red Wings). - IDK, IMO its not really clear as to what the least is referring to.
 * See above, done.
 * Members


 * What does the bold represent?
 * See above, done.
 * References


 * Ref #1 is missing a publisher.
 * I see it redundant to link all the other publishers and not the IIHF, thats from my view point.-- TRU CO   503  21:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the IIHF is already linked in the article, so I figured it would be redundant to link to it several more times in the refs section. I linked the first use of it in refs, is that better?
 * Yep =)-- TRU CO   503  01:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for taking a look. -- Scorpion 0422  22:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - problems resolved to meet WP:WIAFL.-- TRU CO   503  01:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as well presented, written and actually interestingly informative.Yobmod (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support: I made some minor changes, but otherwise looks good! – Nurmsook!  talk...  16:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.