Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/UCI Road World Championships – Men's time trial/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC).

UCI Road World Championships – Men's time trial

 * Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because after extensive work, I believe this list is now worthy to face the scrutiny of the community. I currently have a list up, but is has multiple supports and no outstanding comments. NapHit (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * With all my comments sorted, support. Relentlessly (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. Pleased with the improvements and believe it is worth featured status. Parutakupiu (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comments by PresN

Recusing myself as a delegate to review this list:
 * Germany's Jan Ullrich won the event in 1999, beating Swedish rider Michael Andersson by fourteen seconds, around the 50.8 kilometres (31.6 mi) course in Treviso. -> Germany's Jan Ullrich won the event in 1999, beating Swedish rider Michael Andersson by fourteen seconds around the 50.8 kilometres (31.6 mi) course in Treviso.
 * "edging Rich by a minute and twelve seconds" - edging is an odd word choice, given that that was the largest winning margin to date; would fit better for the 3-second win in 1997
 * Why do you stop listing the winning margin for the 2007-2010 races, and then again for the 2013-2015 races? I don't feel that you need to list them all, but it feel strange to do it for 1994-2006 and then stop.
 * "He would retain the rainbow jersey the following year;" - sudden tense shift, this is surrounded by past tense
 * The third margin column is sorting the 1995 2:03 margin behind the 2009 2:30
 * The table has the 2003 silver margin as 0 seconds... either a mistake or you should mention it in the prose
 * They were split by less than a second! I have added a note to clarify this. NapHit (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * That's it! If you found this review helpful, consider optionally reviewing my World Fantasy Convention Award FLC up above. -- Pres N  18:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments, much appreciated. I have addressed all of your comments. Cheers. NapHit (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Almost ready to support- still find it strange that you don't mention the closest margin (the 2003 sub-1 second) in the text part of the article, though the new note is appreciated. -- Pres N  21:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Added it, though I haven't mentioned the exact gap, I'm not what the exact measurement is when something is smaller than a second. NapHit (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Support -- Pres N  19:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Source Review and Comments by Colonel Wilhelm Klink

I've reviewed all of the sources for this article (as it appears there has been no source check thus far), and everything looks good. Every source is functioning, and they all cite reliable third-party sources; this list meets the citation criteria. As for overall quality, I couldn't find any major issues, but I did find some minor issues, mostly in terms of grammar or punctuation. I managed to fix them myself despite my terminal laziness; if you want to review my edits, just pull up the page history as you wish, and notify me if I managed to throw the article into disarray (as has been known to happen with my editing). I support promotion to FL status; this list is indeed an example of Wikipedia's best. Good work, good luck, and farewell. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 17:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.