Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/United States presidential elections in Utah/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC).

United States presidential elections in Utah

 * Nominator(s): Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that these types of lists on United States presidential elections have a great potential to be FL, and promotion of this list would help me in modifying 50 other similar lists. I almost completely re-formatted the list, added a lead, and key for political parties. It lists all the elections in which the state of Utah participated, with votes and percentage. I intend to make similar changes to all the lists within this series. I would respond to every comment, and try to bring this nomination to FL standards whenever needed. With one of the list (United States presidential elections in Arkansas) currently a FLC, with multiple supports, I nominate this too. Check this page for progress. Thanks! (48 states + Washington D.C. more to go) Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments from HAL

 * Assuming that that is addressed, I am ready to support. ~ HAL  333  18:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Thank you! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude

 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Support from Reywas92

 * Winner and Runner-up are singular, but Other candidates is plural. I think just saying 'Third place' without the note is a also doable. Otherwise it seems nicely consistent with Arkansas so support. Reywas92Talk 15:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I have addressed this issue in this edit. Thanks for your support. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Source review
The reliability and formatting of the references look okay throughout, and the link-checker shows no issues. The source review has been passed. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 20:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Note for FLC director and delegates  The nomination is kept open for almost a month. With three supports and a passed source review, "Is there a consensus for promotion of this nomination?" Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * "Is there a consensus for promotion of this nomination?" Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please don't do this. The way FLC is run, whenever one of the delegates has the time we run through the nominations that look likely to be closable, starting with the oldest, and review/close however many we get through in the time we have available. Whether a nomination is closed in a given pass depends on many things, and is not just a simple "3 supports + a source review" check. There are many reasons why a nomination may stay open for a time after getting 3 supports, some of which have nothing to do with the quality of the list or of the reviews. We recognize that it can be annoying to have to wait, especially when a list is part of a series and the delay is holding up the next nomination in line, but it doesn't make the process faster to poke at us- we want nominations to get closed quickly too, so the pings don't have any beneficial effect.

Promoting. -- Pres N  14:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.