Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior

User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior

 * Nominator(s):  Rambo's   Revenge   (How am I doing?)  

I am nominating this because I believe it is a useful and informative list which meets all of WP:FL?.  Rambo's   Revenge   (How am I doing?)   00:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This should be nominated for WP:AFD... KV5  ( Talk  •  Phils ) 00:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Delist/delete/strong something-or-other --BencherliteTalk 01:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It should begin "This is a list of observations on Wikipedia behavior" per usual standards. If not, it should begin "This is a timeline of the awards and nominations won by series 2 of the discography of the Nobel-laureate-winning USMA alumni of Jesus College, Oxford who were starting pitchers at third base for Aston Villa", which should ensure it gets enough support votes to pass.
 * Bullet numbers 11 to 71 inclusive (odd numbers only) should be in words, not figures, per MOS:MADEITUP
 * The list should be merged somewhere else, such as The O.C. (season 1)
 * It needs a proper Lead
 * Is William Blake a reliable source?
 * Needs some fair-use images to review.


 * Keep per nom. NuclearWarfare : Chat  01:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support— Chris!  c t 01:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Quick promote Because it's the best that we have to offer on the subject. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments from
 * Breaches MOS per WP:OVERLINK, I can't read the article for all the blue.
 * "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia." Doesn't have a source.
 * What makes the Bible a reliable source?
 * List is not sorted by alphabetic order of the second letter of the second word of the second line of each listed item.
 * Violates list naming conventions in lack of "List of" and should therefore be speedily deleted.
 * Entire list breaches the single most important policy on Wikipedia. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete this nefarious list and ban the author. Then inaugurate a new Featured Banned Users and promote the author there; goodness knows he's promoted himself enough elsewhere.  Antandrus  (talk) 02:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * "As soon as someone attacks the community, or any portion of it, by writing a rant on their user page, Act V of their Wiki Tragedy has begun. It will end, inevitably, with their departure or expulsion from the project."
 * Should I be woried now? -- Scorpion 0422  03:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Too long; didn't read. Should be trimmed to no more than 50-75 letters; then we'll talk.  Meanwhile, delete.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:02, April 1, 2009 (UTC)


 * Promote per No. 71 and AS A PROTEST AGAINST CENSORSHIP AND ADMINISTRATOR ABUSE. Actually, seriously, promote author to "featured contributor".  --RobertG &#9836; talk 16:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)