Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Wisden Cricketers of the Year/archive1

Wisden Cricketers of the Year
How many cricket lists are there :) -- ALoan (Talk) 11:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the title (was Wisden Cricketers of the Year, but that is a redirect). -- ALoan (Talk) 09:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Moved it to Wisden Cricketers of the Year to address comments below. -- ALoan (Talk) 30 June 2005 13:59 (UTC)


 * And how good they are. Support. Filiocht | Blarneyman 11:55, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support how about putting it into a table? =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:46, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Is there enough information here to need a table? Isn't a bullet-point list sufficient to give a date and names? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think so; tables can be overdone, too. Filiocht | Talk 10:02, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * The "see also" section could be expanded to include more cricket-related ideas. --Dmcdevit 04:03, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you will have to help me out - which other cricket-related ideas do you think should be added? -- ALoan (Talk) 09:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * In all honesty, the extent of my cricket knowledge comes from Lagaan. It's just, I see the "see also" section as more important in a list since there is less text for internal-linking in. Can't you think of a few related article that would be helpful for the reader interested in the topic? (Like cricket, which I don't even see linked there?) --Dmcdevit 07:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comments (1) Some of the names are given as Firstname Lastname, others as "XY Lastname". To be consistent, shouldn't they all be Firstname Lastname? (2) A few more pictures would be nice. (3) I think "Wisden Cricketers of the Year" would be better (for the same reason that I think "Sri Lankan national cricket captains" is the right page there, SmokeDog 07:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - but would prefer to see the naming inconsistency fixed, except when commonly known as "XY Lastname" as in W.G. Grace. Cricinfo and Wisden are fairly consistent in referring to cricketers as "XY Lastname". - Ian &equiv; talk 28 June 2005 06:08 (UTC)
 * I've moved the page to "Cricketers" and stripped out some of the initials. I am a bit torn between linking all of the names, and ending up with a forrest of redlinks, and leaving as it is. -- ALoan (Talk) 30 June 2005 13:59 (UTC)
 * They should definitely be linked, even if that means a lot of red - we'll presumably want articles on all of those people eventually. The solution to a "forest of red" is to write more articles! (That's not a criticism, by the way - it's absolutely astonishing how many of these are already blue). If they are linked, I will support. OpenToppedBus - My Talk July 5, 2005 10:09 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but what about the requirement for a "large majority" of blue links? -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 12:48 (UTC)
 * I know, I know. I very nearly opposed it, and I really should do, for exactly that reason. I have done on some of the other cricket lists (and would with Bangladeshi captains if I'd looked at it in time). But it's just so impressive that as many of these articles exist as currently do, that I just can't bring myself to be the obstacle standing in its way. I reserve the right to be inconsistent and illogical from time to time! OpenToppedBus - My Talk July 5, 2005 13:27 (UTC)