Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/World Fantasy Award for Best Collection/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 20:10, 11 November 2014.

World Fantasy Award for Best Collection

 * ''Nominator(s):  Pres N  16:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Back again with an old favorite! I've nominated this list before, but after 2 months and only one comment/support, it fell off the nominations page. I'm bringing it back now for another attempt. Following in the footsteps of the World Fantasy Awards for Best Novel, Best Novella, and Best Short Story, (not to mention the dozens of Hugo Awards, Nebula Awards, etc.) we have here the World Fantasy Award for Best Collection. And it's a strange one. Not so much for what it is now, and what it originally was- an award for the best collections of fantasy works by a single author- but because for 10 years in the middle of the 40 it's been around, anthologies of works by multiple authors were eligible, until they so overran the category that they got split out into their own. I've tried to make it clear what's going on, though, so there shouldn't be any confusion. Anyways, this list follows the same format as the previous 28 sci-fi/fantasy award FLs- table, winners, sorting, yadda yadda yadda, and as always comments from those previous FLCs have been replicated for this list. Thanks all for reviewing, and hopefully this time it will make it through! -- Pres N  16:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support per last time. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support: Very well written, organized, and cited. Usually I make a "Comments by Ɱ" section and go into depth trying to fix problems, but after reading it, I found that's not necessary. Well done.-- ɱ    (talk)  23:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support. Very well referenced and well written, it meets the criteria. --Carioca (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * – SchroCat (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.