Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/2006 NFL Draft

2006 NFL Draft
nominate for de-listing. 2001 NFL Draft and 2007 NFL Draft have every single trades referenced, which it should be. I'd like to see that kind of treatment given to this article as well, And until this is done this list should removed from featured list until then. I have also put other drafts for removal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gman124 (talk • contribs) 3 January 2008
 * Violates WP:WIAFL 1(c)Gman124 (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The items in the "Miscellaneous" section also need citations or should be removed. -- Scorpion0422 01:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't disagree, but I wonder if, instead of de-listing, cleaning up and sourcing, then re-listing - maybe we can just skip all that? Clean it up and source it?  Same with the other five lists? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 02:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I support SatyrTN suggestion that the minor Miscellaneous section be tagged as unsourced.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 20:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The section really ought to go because a lot of it is trivial and unsourced and does not belong in a featured quality article. -- Scorpion0422 15:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist There has been no sign that the concerns are being addressed on the article. -- Scorpion0422 15:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist per WP:WIAFL's 1(c). Plus, WP:NFL was notified of these nominations for removal, but no one stepped up to just "clean it up and source it". If anyone wants to "clean it up and source it", then he may have one week to do so. As it appears now, though, having an unsourced list as a FL does not do any good to Wikipedia.-- Crzycheetah 20:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist, unfortunately, this and the other four. Ideally this summer I will have ample time to go back and handle all the problems of the five. Until then.. :( Wizardman  19:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)