Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Abingdon Boys School discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC).

Abingdon Boys School discography

 * Notified: Town of Cats, WikiProject Discographies

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer meets our accessibility guidelines as required under WP:FLCR #5. Specifically, the tables have no captions, and they lack unique row-headers, which should be the title of the release in each case. RexxS (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: but why not fix it to comply rather than nominating for removal? Like you said, MOS:DTAB indicates that scopes and captions should be used. Heartfox (talk) 22:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to fix every FL with accessibility flaws. I think it's preferable to teach an active WikiProject how to fix the FLs themselves. --RexxS (talk) 23:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Added scope="col" to each column. Honestly, I think a bigger issue would be most of the references going to Amazon store pages. The accessibility issues described are easy to rectify, but if there aren't reliable sources, then that indicates deeper issues. (Edit: Looks like Amazon is OK for release dates. Not sure about the notes, however, but since most of them are basically "they did this one song" or are cited to Oricon, I would guess it would be fine? I don't know.) MSG17 (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Update has thoroughly overhauled the article, and all tables now have captions, sensible row headers and appropriate scopes. It may be that all of these types of FL dating from 2010 and earlier need a similar makeover to bring them up to our current standards, but I believe that Abingdon Boys School discography should now remain a Featured List. Hopefully the FLC director or delegates will agree and we can close this nomination. --RexxS (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Update I updated the tables to the correct format and simplified the refs by using the full chart archive, instead of linking to all positions indiviudally. — Lirim  |  Talk  23:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

The stated issues with the list have been fixed, and there is no consensus to delist at this time. As a side note, thank you for nominating this- we should probably do an large-scale accessibility review of our older FLs, but in the meantime this nomination prompted me to start doing structured accessibility reviews of our active FLCs, which has already started to lead to repeat nominators fixing accessibility issues prior to nomination. -- Pres N  03:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.