Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Digimon video games/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:26:26 15 December 2019 (UTC).

List of Digimon video games

 * Notified: Tezero, WikiProject Video games

Reading through this I notice a glaring number of errors that featured lists pages do not, and should not, have. These being the following: Article does not seem up to snuff with the Featured List criteria, and as such I vote to have it demoted. Namcokid47 (talk) 00:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * GameFAQs is used a multitude of times throughout the article, which is not considered a reliable source per these discussions
 * Infobox should list all companies that developed Digimon games, yet it only lists Dimps and Namco Bandai
 * Several links are not archived
 * Several links are missing dates, authors or publishers, sometimes all of these
 * Lead is not written that well and is a bit hard to read. Examples being: "Digimon is a series of role-playing video games and other genres (such as fighting, action and card battling)", "The series started in 1999 (in the West) with the game Digimon World for the PlayStation, but released in 1998, there was a Japan-exclusive...", etc.
 * Hey it does not look like you informed the original nominator and WikiProjects about this. GamerPro64  14:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose This is just something that you can fix yourself. If you see something you don't like, just be bold and make those improvements yourself. Personally, I am not a huge Digimon fan, so I would have little knowledge of how to fix the lead and make it better. According to your name and user page, you are a big Namco fan, so this seems like something you could do better research on than me. KingSkyLord (Talk page &#124; Contributions) 18:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * see below, I don't think your assertion is actually as realistically implemented as you believe. Would you revisit this please? The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 22:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak keep a few dubious sources need to be replaced, but otherwise it's okay. A pity the nominator couldn't fix said issues rather than attempt a delisting here.  The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * But that's the thing, before nominating this for a delist I spent a long while combing through Google and the Internet Archive to find info on these, and turned up with nothing. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 20:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Well in that case I'll move to support delisting. Thanks for your efforts to try to resolve this.  The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 22:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Support Per Namcokid47. The sourcing of it no longer matches up with Wikipedia standards.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.