Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of New England Patriots seasons/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Dabomb87 17:02, 22 November 2009.

List of New England Patriots seasons
Notified: WikiProject NFL, Jayron32, and Pats1

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it doesn't meet the current criteria. It's been two years since this list is at WP:FL, are there still not a single image that can be used in this page?-- Cheetah  (talk)  23:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The lead should be larger, referenced and without any redundant info.
 * The key section is really needed, especially for the awards.
 * The colors should not be the only indicators. Symbols need to be added.
 * The boldface should be removed from the table. The headings only should have boldface text.
 * The awards need to be referenced.
 * The footnotes should be referenced, as well.
 * As for the general references, how reliable are "Sports E-cyclopedia" and "Football @ JT-SW.com. John Troan"?
 * Yep, this could use a "refresh". I don't think it would be that hard though.... The Rambling Man (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Looking forward to helping improve this article. Just some questions for the nominator so that I can help bring this up to standard:
 * What additional information do you feel the lead needs, but which is not currently there?
 * I'd like to see more about the history of the franchise.-- Cheetah  (talk)  08:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Likewise, for the information you feel needs additional referencing, especially the footnotes and the lead: What specific pieces of information do you feel are inadequately covered by the general references in the article? I don't just want to litter random references just to "keep up appearances", so I would like to know what facts in the lead and footnotes you question or doubt the veracity of, and which cannot be readily found in the 4 references already in the article.  I can probably dig up references for the awards pretty easily, but I would like to know which facts are being doubted so that I can add the proper references.
 * All footnotes need individual citing. I have doubts about reliability of the two aforementioned references. The other two that is listed on this page provide info on stats only. There are several statements in the lead that needs citing, as well. The statements about AFL merger, team relocation, and Dallas Cowboys.-- Cheetah  (talk)  08:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to be combattive here, but you seriously doubt that the AFL and NFL merged? That is a disputed fact that needs citation?  It seems like the sort of common knowledge thing that doesn't usually demand a direct citation.  It sounds like your just picking random facts so we can have some random number of citations in the text, rather than asking for doubtful material which need support.  I can understand where the footnotes need a cite, I can provide some of those, but common historical knowledge, which is unsurprising and non-controversial needs direct proof?  Serious?  -- Jayron  32  03:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am serious. You probably are a football fan all your life and it's "common knowledge" to you, but for a non-football fan, like me, a proof is needed. Also, as a Wikipedian and a FLC regular, I've seen some football-related pages where it was stated that the merger happened in 1966, some pages even stated that it happened in 1967, so I always ask for a reference to back up that information.-- Cheetah  (talk)  05:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The other, cosmetic changes can be made relatively easily, so I can get on those.
 * Again, thanks for the tips on improving this article, and I look forward to your responses so I can work on making this even better! -- Jayron  32  00:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Note from FLRC director I am something of a fan of the Patriots. If anyone thinks that my neutrality is compromised because of this, I will gladly recuse from closing the FLRC. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll only recuse you if you help save it! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * List of Minnesota Vikings seasons is an example of an FL that meets current standards (it was revamped at an FLRC in August). Dabomb87 (talk) 03:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Remove – Not enough has been done to resolve the initial concerns. In addition, FLC has been moving away from "This is a list of" openings, the table could be made sortable (as is done in List of New York Giants seasons), and the new image needs alt text.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 21:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Delist - As Giants2008 said above, the initial concerns still have not been resolved; the only edits since his comment are an update of the result for the next week of play. KV5 ( Talk  •  Phils ) 15:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.