Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/1993 Storm Complex

1993 North American Storm Complex
Cool picture. I think it should be a featured pic.
 * Nominate and Support. íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 18:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Low res, jaggy, and there are already several great (and featured) images of weather systems (setting a calibur this image does not meet). Staxringold talkcontribs 19:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Can't the low res and jaggedness problem be fixed? íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 23:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably not, unless a better version of the original image is found, otherwise there's almost nothing that can be done to improve the quality. --Pharaoh Hound 00:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose per Staxringold. However, would be glad to support
 * 1. an image with better resolution, or
 * 2. even better, a high-resolution visible image —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Runningonbrains (talk • contribs).


 * Oppose.-- as per reasons state above. Geoffrey Gibson 04:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose - I personally don't like using GIFs for anything except animation, ergo I don't support. Plus I wouldn't exactly call it stunning or massively informative. —Vanderdecken&there4; ∫ξφ 15:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I like it, its easy to read and interpret. TomStar81 20:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Not a very good quality and we get dozens of storms every year -- BWF89 22:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose - There have already been too many featured articles on storms. Unless they are culturally or historically significant... leave 'em off the main page. -OldMajor 02:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - read the article. This storm is very historically significant. It was also named the storm of the century. íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 14:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I personally hate infrared satellite imagery. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)