Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/20110103 Jame-e Kabir and Roknedin Mauseleum Yazd Iran.jpg

Yazd
Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2012 at 18:16:59 (UTC)
 * Reason:Very High Quality Photo and Good Framing, also featured picture in Commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Yazd
 * FP category for this image:
 * Creator:Ggia


 * Support as nominator --Mahan (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose Surely better angles exist for this building, the angle shot over other buildings makes it look very cluttered and obscures the majority of the building. — raeky  t  20:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Question As per similar recent noms, is the scaffolding a permanant fixture? If not then we should really wait until a picture is available without the scaffolding to nominate that... gaz hiley  08:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * From my recent visit to Iran, most of the monuments had some scaffolding. I was told that repairs always go on and one thing or the other will be under repairs. --Muhammad (talk) 14:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Muhammad... I think I am going to have to Oppose though as the way I read your response is that although there is always something being repaired, this building isn't always being repaired, ergo I suggest a new picture attempt once this scaffolding is gone... Not knowing the building I can't really comment on —  raeky  's opinion about the view other than to agree that you can't really see much of this building in this nom...  gaz hiley  10:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I misguided you. I meant the complex/building will always have such distractions as something or the other will always be under repair--Muhammad (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per Raeky and also re the scaffolding - its worth waiting for the scaffolding to be removed and trying for a shot then. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * SupportThis is a featured picture on Wikimedia Commons.Alborzagros (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose because in the current version of the article this image isn't providing an abundance of EV. I could support it if the picture was better used in this or some other article. --Pine✉ 17:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * SupportThe quality is amazing, and featured picture on Wikimedia Commons-- Mahdi  talk  17:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose The focal point of the image isn't clear, doesn't shout FP to me. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)