Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/3D Glass Balls

3D Glass Balls


I think that this image should be featured because it is clear, simple and balanced. (It can also be used for a background) Appears in: 3D computer graphics Created by:


 * Nominate and support. - TheJosh 03:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too dim, unattractive composition, does not illustrate raytracing features clearly enough.  Image:3chromeballs.png is a better illustration of a basic raytrace. Redquark 03:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose What does this image illustrate about 3D computer graphics? Not very much... the example Redquark provided was much richer. ~MDD4696 17:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose There are many much more "pretty" and illustrative images of raytracing. The all-red of the image is boring and it isn't even that obvious that the image is ray traced - Adrian Pingstone 19:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too dark and simple, uninteresting. -- Tewy  19:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Ehh. This doesn't impress me enough to be a featured picture. Sorry. Valley2city 21:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose - Our existing FPs are much, much better illustrations of raytracing than this, sorry. Anyone with a copy of 3DSMax or similar could knock up a picture like this in about 5 minutes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yummifruitbat (talk • contribs) 21:25, 22 October 2006.
 * Oppose As per Redquark. - jlao   0  4  02:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 13:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)