Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Alexander Nevsky Cathedral Sofia

Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia


I agree that photos edited, other than contranst, etc. to make them clearer, are not appropriate,  David R. Ingham 05:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC) ~ Veledan • Talk 12:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. - —This unsigned comment was added by Kingstonjr (talk • contribs) 07:07, 3 April 2006.
 * Neutral - I don't really like that man at the bottom left corner.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 15:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * He's gone now. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-04-3 17:01
 * Support I like it. The fact that it was copyrighted confused me, but I researched and is an allowed tag. I updated What is a featured picture? to make it clearer.   —This unsigned comment was added by Ravedave (talk • contribs).
 * Oppose The ground level is cropped off at both sides of the picture. I especially object to the edited pic with the person "removed". I don't think photo manipulation of this sort is appropriate for an encyclopedia. This edit seems particularly egregious because some of the wall stains on the bldg. appear to have been removed along with the person. --dm (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See further replies at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates/Alexander Nevsky Cathedral Sofia.
 * I've fixed my egregious/outrageously bad/offensive mistake by restoring those dozen pixels of dirt to their full glory. Now please, stop taking 1984 so seriously. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-04-3 21:35
 * It's a nice photo, impressive building, but I really can't support since it looks wrong with the left and right sides cropped. Sorry. Opp chowells 08:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * A vote alone does not improve an argument's rationale. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-04-7 05:39
 * Support Nice arrangement. Eye catching structure. --Philopedia 14:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)