Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Alice Paul

Alice Paul
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016  at 19:18:18 (UTC)
 * Reason:It's a really impressively detailed image; Harris & Ewing would later become the largest photographic studio in the United States, and with pictures like this, it's not hard to see why. #10wikicommonsdays Day 3
 * Articles in which this image appears:Alice Paul et al.
 * FP category for this image:One could argue a few places, but as she was also head of the National Woman's Party, Featured pictures/People/Political seems reasonable.
 * Creator:Harris & Ewing, restored by Adam Cuerden


 * Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Support - Pretty great photo for 1915. Also, how about that hat? Kaldari (talk) 04:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment There's some uncanny white glow from her dress, maybe the highlights can be toned down a bit. Brandmeistertalk  13:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It is on the original too (scanned from a negative ). Is the original burned to enhance lighting/contrast, or is it a lens effect, or ...? It is uncanny, although I do Support as is, given photo's age and EV (and the hat of course). Bammesk (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is with me turning the highlights down a bit to bring out the detail. I think it's reflecting light a bit. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Support – Jobas (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 19:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)