Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Amundsen-Scott marsstation ray h edit.jpg

Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station




A stunning image of the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, this photograph was taken using a 25 second exposure in order to gain enough light to take the picture. The red light is from the base, while the dazzling green is an aurora. The image illustrates both the articles Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station and Antarctica and was uploaded to Commons by Jsymmetry.
 * Nominate and support. - Flcelloguy (A note? ) 01:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support -- TomStar81 01:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support --Breath taking. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 01:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong support. zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Alr 03:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - really great.--Deglr6328 04:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Was lloking at it and thinking "that looks like FP material" lol Circeus 06:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Wow. that's really neat. psch  e  mp  |  talk  08:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support (Diliff's edit). Eye catching, beautiful, magnificent, whatever... --Janke | Talk 08:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Beautiful indeed. Mikeo 10:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent. Deckiller 13:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. I loved this image the instant I saw it, a fantastic pick!. Bziomek 17:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support no-brainer. –Joke 19:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support really amazing picture Halsteadk 19:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Incredible--Lewk_of_Serthic 19:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support (Diliff's edit) wonderful ~ Veledan • Talk 22:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * ( + ) Support Unreal --Fir0002 00:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Wild!--Lordkinbote 07:47, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Now I don't dare to oppose, but the cropping is a little tight for my taste, especially at the bottom. Poor framing? --Dschwen 17:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I'll buck the trend even further and say that I don't really like the composition much at all. It DOES seem to be an interesting scene but I don't think the position is ideal. It just seems messy and unfocused to me. The image itself could also do with a subtle clean up.. There are a lot of hot pixels and noise that could easily be removed and I don't believe that it is overstepping the bounds regarding editing, as they are the by-product of digital imaging and not in front of the lens at all. I'm not sure I'd support it regardless of how it was cleaned up but I might have a go at it anyway. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 23:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose the first image, support dillif's edit, a massive improvement IMO. chowells 01:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support A breathtaking picture. S iva1979 Talk to me  14:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Calderwood 07:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support as it is awesome. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Absolument oui! 22:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong support - I couldn't even believe it was real until I opened up the full resolution version. This looks like something straight out of Doom III (you know, the research station on Mars).  -- Cyde Weys  18:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. A fantastic image, with an almost unearthly feel. --Fipe 10:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks not of this planet. Awesome.-- Dakota ~   °  10:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 06:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong support One of the best pictures I've ever seen, and I'm a photographer. Bluefusion13 04:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

