Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Andrew Bird

Andrew Bird


I think it is an excellent photography, it illustrate the Andrew Bird article.


 * Nominate and support. - Ericd 02:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose, very grainy when viewed at fullsize as well as blown highlights on the microphone and hands. –– Lid(Talk) 04:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Grainy. - User:Samsara (talk· contribs) 07:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose -- Grainy, blurry, dark... not the greatest depiction of this subject. tiZom(2¢)  16:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Per above, though I do like the composition. -- Tewy  02:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, from an encyclopedic aspect and taking the FP criteria under consideration, I feel this image fails. But the story being told by the selective lighting is intriguing. Conceptually, it is a nice image.--Andrew c 17:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, black and white can be pretty... but this guy was born in 1973 and I don't think feel that there is a good reason to have him in B&W without very good reason. gren グレン 15:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Very low light is a very good reason. Ericd 13:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 19:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)