Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg

Australian Blue Dragonfly
Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly. 
 * Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg -- Chris 73 Talk 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg if it appeared in an article. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * See #1 in Dragonfly - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support when placed in a proper article. -- BRIAN 0918   17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * See #1 in Dragonfly - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support if it meets the criterion of illustrating an article. Denni &#9775; 02:10, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
 * See #1 in Dragonfly - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support I support the first one, the second one isn't quite as good. But I'm generally quite impressed. G-Man 22:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support The first one is an awesome shot - agree with G-man. -Lommer | talk 01:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support only the first one. The second shot could use some enhancing. JoJan 17:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support #1 - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support either. Nice pictures.  But is there a higher resolution version? --jacobolus (t) 23:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Promoted: +10 / - 0 -- Solipsist 20:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)