Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bangle

Bangle
(non-commercial). Taken to WP:PUI. MER-C 09:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Reason:This is an image of the jewelery item Bangles, taken by Flickr user Surajram, its flickr page can be seen here. It is licensed under a free creative commons's license, and it appears on the article Bangle. This photos has some beautiful colours, and its one of the best composed pictures I have seen of bangles ever! I also think its one of most visually pleasing photos I've seen on Wikepedia, I have nominated it so that I can know if there are others who agree with me on the great quality of this image.
 * Articles this image appears in:Bangle, Jewelery
 * Creator:Flikr User: Surajram at, uploaded by Zainub
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Zainub 20:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose depth of field is too small to really see their shape, and the stacking makes this worse. Debivort 21:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Pretty - yes. Descriptive - no. This doesn't actually show what a bangle is - therefore unencyclopaedic. Try listing at Commons FP perhaps? Witty Lama 21:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Witty Lama. Too much is out of focus. -- Phoenix  (talk) 21:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose a. Jewelry should be worn; b. Illegal license ( $ ). ~ trialsanderrors 16:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It has a creative commons license, how could that be illegal? --Zainub 17:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Noncommercial is not acceptable, see . ~ trialsanderrors 18:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That link is broken unless one has a Commons account, so care to explain what you're getting at here? -- Phoenix  (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * A free license requires that the image can be used for commercial purposes. This one is a non-commercial license only (the crossed-out $ sign). Hence it is not eligible for Featured Picture here. ~ trialsanderrors 03:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See also WP:CSD: Improper license. Images licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "non-derivative use" or "used with permission" that were uploaded on or after May 19, 2005, and for which no assertion of fair use is provided. [1] This includes images licensed under a "Non-commercial Creative Commons License".[2] Such images uploaded before May 19, 2005 may also be speedily deleted if they are not used in any articles. ~ trialsanderrors 04:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected trialsanderrors, you can de-list this nomination if you want. --Zainub 07:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You can of course ask the original photographer if s/he wants to make it available under a commercial license. ~ trialsanderrors 17:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)