Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Beautiful Demoiselle

Beautiful Demoiselle
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2010 at 06:40:10 (UTC)


 * Reason:High quality and EV
 * Articles in which this image appears:Beautiful Demoiselle
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
 * Creator:Richard Bartz


 * Support set as nominator --Nergaal (talk) 06:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think these two pictures should have different nominations. They are from different creators and have both the chance of promotion. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Does it really matter? Voters could say yay to both, one of them or none of them. Nergaal (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Not so, only one picture can be promoted in a given nomination. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine, then take the first as the original and the second as an alt. Nergaal (talk) 17:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Two are sometimes promoted in one; as "male and female", these wouldn't make a bad set, though I admit two separate nominations would probably be best. Nominations like this often cause confusion/lead to problems. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Removed second altogether. Nergaal (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Stunning! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Colorful.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Why aren't people voting on this? What is it missing? Nergaal (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The opposes and discussion at the German FPC give a clue: . Along the same lines as Purpy Pupple's comment, the head is slightly unsharp.   Mae din\ talk 20:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Support good picture! It seems that the head and thorax are less sharp than the wing, but meh, it's good enough. Nice and encyclopedic. Purpy Pupple (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. J Milburn (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

-- Jujutacular  talk 15:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)