Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Beautiful Panjal

Fresh : paddy fields in Panjal

 * Reason:It portrays the beauty of nature.
 * Articles this image appears in: none
 * Creator:mk


 * Support as nominator &mdash; Mk2339 12:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose It doesn't appear in any article, distracting power lines, the grass isn't quite as sharp as it could be, distracting overexposed white roof among the trees, slightly underexposed overall. Also, many photos could be said to "portray the beauty of nature". A nice photo, but not FP quality. --13:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Doesn't appear in any article and has unknown copyright status. It is advisable to lurk a while to get familiar with the standards and procedures before nominating your first picture. --Dschwen 13:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I don't like the angle of this. Maybe if it felt a little less distracting it could work. -- Thorpe | talk 13:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

MER-C 11:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose No article! Try commons. Debivort 17:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, as mentioned above, Commons perhaps. -- Phoenix2  (holla) 07:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * OpposeThat picture does not really show anything, plus the light conditions and composition are wrong.--Svetovid 09:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Electricity pylons illustrate the beauty of nature?? - Adrian Pingstone 09:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, no source, does not look impressive to me. - Mailer Diablo 02:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, with a suggestion that this be moved to a speedy close.Spikebrennan 17:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, No source information, low resolution, low encyclopedic value, and it doesn't appear in an article. Cacophony 23:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: This image can now be deleted as having held a no source tag for long enough- do we have a definite source/would anyone be opposed to its deletion? J Milburn 10:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)