Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bengal Tiger

Bengal Tiger

 * Reason:clear well focused and it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured.
 * Articles this image appears in:tiger
 * Creator:Indianhilbilly

Neutral- An excellent image, but the whole animal should appear, not just the upper torso. ~ Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 19:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Alokprasad84 (talk) 08:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Unsharp, low resolution (and only depicts part of the animal). Pstuart84 Talk 18:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support-Excellent image showing facial details in closeup. Look at the clarity around eyes and mustaches. Good lighting and no special effects. -- gp pande «talk» 08:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Pstuart84. Mfield (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose regretfully. I don't know what it is about this image, it's not out of focus, but it's not quite in focus either. Wish is was, 'cause it's a great pose. Clegs (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose, regretfully. Good lighting, good pose, and I have gotten over my distaste for head-only animal portraits.  But the focus isn't quite up to the standards of other FP animal portraits: [[Image:Siberischer tiger de edit02.jpg|20px]], [[Image:Giraffe08 - melbourne zoo edit.jpg|20px]], [[Image:Gibraltar Barbary Macaque.jpg|20px]], [[Image:Jaguar at Edinburgh Zoo.jpg|20px]] for example.
 * Oppose The image is a bit thin, and after seeing this in comparison, I'm afraid I can't support. Spencer  T♦C 22:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose It meets the requirements, but the resolution is STILL an issue. I would love to see this at higher resolution. Crassic ! (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)