Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Berliner Zeitung November 2013.jpg

Berliner Zeitung
Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2014  at 11:29:00 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality and resolution images of this famouse GDR architectural landmark in the very centre of Berlin.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Berliner Zeitung
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
 * Creator:Arild Vågen


 * Support as nominator --ArildV (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose — Cluttery image (foreground) of essentially monobloc architecture that I don't think would draw much interest from English readers. The subject publication is of interest historically, however, being a survivor from the DDR, and might make a good FA or DYK. Sca (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Assumptions regarding English readers interest should be completely irrelevant for assessing image quality and encyclopedic relevance imo. The building is architecturally relevant (regardless of what one thinks about East German Modernism), and a landmark in Berlin. And since the house has been the newspaper's headquarters since it was built relevant for the article.--ArildV (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It would be interesting to know when it was built. Sca (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Support looks good to me. Nikhil (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Nothing technically wrong with the image, but the busy foreground obscuring it somewhat just doesn't give it the simplicity that a featured picture of a building deserves. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  16:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I'm open to the notion that the building itself is relevant, but nothing in the article currently discuses the point. As such I find EV to be lacking, and especially so when taking the cluttered foreground into account. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 12:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)