Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bloedel Reserve Willow Tree

Willow Tree, Bloedel Reserve

 * Reason: High quality image, good composition.
 * Articles this image appears in: Bloedel Reserve
 * Creator:User:Geaugagrrl


 * Support as nominator &#8734;&#9788;Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 03:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - maybe it could do with a little more sharpness, but it has my support. BTW, is this edited? diego_pmc (talk) 07:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The image has not been edited. &#8734;&#9788;Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 13:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - ineligible for FP because it isn't in an article. Cacophony (talk) 07:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added the image to Bloedel Reserve. faithless   (speak)  07:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping out a newbie. &#8734;&#9788;Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 13:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. :) faithless   (speak)  01:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose, much of the image is dulled and it doesn't seem to be the best illustration of the reserve. gren グレン 17:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Prominent artifacts and it's not very encyclopedic. It's more illustrative of a willow tree than it is of the reserve, and even then the main subject is cut off. CillaИ &diams; XC 18:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - very heavily artifacted, low contrast, low enc. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Enc. is lacking, even though it's a beautiful picture. Some unsharpness in corners - maybe shot with a compact digital camera? But, keep trying, you might submit to Picture peer review first for more input and/or suggestions. One right away: Always use the "best" quality for storage (largest file size). --Janke | Talk 12:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the helpful input. The camera is now out of commission, so it is time to get a new one.  &#8734;&#9788;Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 05:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Vanderdecken. Spencer  T♦C 11:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 11:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)