Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blood values (change to the combined)

Blood values (change to the combined)
However, since then I've also made a combined image of mass and molar concentration (the molar one was considered too similar to, in itself, also be featured). Still, in my point of view, they should be viewed together, not only to get the whole picture, but also because mass values can more easily be translated to molar ones and vice versa by knowing their molar mass. Therefore, I suggest that the combined image should be FP instead of just the mass one.
 * Reason:The image File:Reference ranges for blood tests - by mass.png (thumb below), showing reference ranges for blood tests sorted by mass has been a FP for almost a year now.
 * Articles this image appears in:Potentially any article where en:File:Reference ranges for blood tests - by mass.png currently is on display.
 * Creator:Mikael Häggström


 * Support as nominator --Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Not quite as fun as your CT scans, but still encyclopedic and wonderful.  Thank you for your dedication to the project.  Durova  320 15:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. High encyclopedic value, "eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article". For sections of articles about blood molar values, that's an achievement. Mostlyharmless (talk) 01:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Wildly complicated image, but loaded with info. Staxringold talkcontribs 17:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support I believe I supported both (I can't find the molarity nom, though,?). Very clear, accurate based on several sources I own, and detailed.  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 01:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support An impressively informative illustration. Sam Barsoom 04:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note that this nomination only results in a promotion of the mass/molar concentration picture. If you think that this picture makes the other one unnecessary, please nominate it to be delisted. Thanks :) Makeemlighter (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll nominate the mass-only picture for delisting.Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)