Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Calla Lily

Calla Lily
Two photos of a calla lily +6 / -5 -- Solipsist 19:54, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 
 * Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 06:54, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support the regular pic. The close-up isn't helpful in identifying the flower and thus doesn't provide useful info. Mgm|(talk) 07:36, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support first version.  brian0918  &#153;  12:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support first version. Might be improved by evening out the crop, but not really necessary. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 15:53, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Sorry, just not anything spectacular.  No interesting angles, not interesting enough use of line, shape, texture, etc. It's a nice flower, but not featured picture worthy.  jacobolus (t) 04:53, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with jacobolus. Junes 08:22, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with Junes. &mdash;Jonas Olson 10:10, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support the first version. Though plain, the flower, the central focus, is strikingly clear and aesthetically pleasing. - Sango123 00:12, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support first too, agree with Sango Circeus 02:18, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Doesn't have featured pic qualities. Enochlau 09:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose Pretty picture but not extraordinary. Pollinator 21:50, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)