Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Canada goose flight

Canada Goose in Flight
Maybe not quite as tack sharp as the Brown Pelican, this is still sensational (and for those that were concerned it doesn't have a visible halo)
 * Nominate and Support --Fir0002 22:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support . Good composition, lighting, and image quality. A crop might improve, but it's fine the way it is right now. -- Pharaoh Hound  (talk)  22:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 . -- Pharaoh Hound  (talk)  15:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2. -- Pharaoh Hound  (talk)  21:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Artisticly and technically excellent. Encyclopedic, a good FP. HighInBC 01:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit #2 Another great upload by Fir0002, very artistically displayed bird, and encyclopedic with a caption on Canadian geese. -- Will Mak  050389  03:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Agree with Pharaoh Hound that cropping may enhance the image, but excellent regardless.--Melburnian 06:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * update support to edit 2 for cropping and tweaking of noise. --Melburnian 00:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2. Very nice image - I agree it could be slightly sharper and could be cropped at the bottom slightly (quite a lot of out-of-focus wasteland underneith the bird). Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've done a cropped version for all those interested. -- Pharaoh Hound  (talk)  15:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for duplication Pharoah Hound, I just noticed that the background could also do with some slight noise reduction, but thats just a minor thing. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2 &mdash; Much more clear now that the noise has been reduced. ♠ SG →Talk 20:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2 Nice goose. - echidnae 18:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2. The image speaks for itself. -- Tewy  19:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2. Beautifully captured. Halsteadk 21:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2 Kudos to Pharaoh Hound & Dilliff for great edit work on the image! Jam01 10:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 2 very nice shot and the edits take care of any issues I'd have with it. Cat-five - talk 08:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support original. I don't care about which edit because I haven't been able to find any noticeable difference, but the original owner and/or uploader should be mentioned in the edited version and you can't release the edited with the GFDL when the original author only used a CC share alike. - Mgm|(talk) 09:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Wonderful image. Original is good, editing is not needed.--JyriL talk 22:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Mikeo 00:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)