Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Blankenhain panorama (aka).jpg

Castle Blankenhain panorama


Sheer beauty, great resolution and sharpness. Appears in the Crimmitschau article and is featured on the Wikimedia Commons. License is Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5.


 * Nominate and support. - [[Image:Flag of Bulgaria.svg|20px]] → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → Talk 19:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, but what's up with all the castle pics? -JPM 22:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment beautiful picture of a not to thrilling subject. Would have preferred the viewpoint to be set a little to the left to avoid the rubble on the right. --Dschwen 22:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. I like it. Alr 02:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Very clear.  drumguy 8800  - speak? 04:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, even though we're having a flood of panoramas and castles righrt now... --Janke | Talk 08:32, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support It may be yet another castle but i like this one.--Ali K 07:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - very crisp, clear and bright. JQF 20:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose. Another bland and boring photo. Some square buildings, some flat water, some faded trees, and a muted sky. Yes, it's clear and crisp and bright and technically perfect. But a featured picture should be stunning, and the only thing stunning about this image is its mediocrity. Zafiroblue05 07:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Some square buildings, some flat water, some faded trees, and a muted sky". That's exotic for me! deeptrivia (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly! There's no need for a featured picture to be exotic - that is, by the very nature of the word, inconsistent. What's exotic to some people is trivial to others, and vice versa. A FP shouldn't necessarily be exotic, but it should necessarily be striking. And this picture is anything but, particularly in relation to the general norm of nominated pictures. Zafiroblue05 23:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * (+) Support - we're not voting for "interesting" pics here. What we need are "informative" pics, and this one tells pretty everything about the castle. Halibutt 01:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support A rather picture --Lewk_of_Serthic 02:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * A rather sentence you have there... enochlau (talk) 09:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Extraordinary detail, even to the patterns on the roof. enochlau (talk) 09:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ( + ) Support Absolutely beautiful --Fir0002 21:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support nice photo, though I agree with the comments about the rocks on the right. chowells 22:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. - Darwinek 23:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support very good colours, focus and a nice composition Eteru 09:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, only thing wrong with it is the two guys on the left side of the image. Oh well. gren グレン ? 08:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support nice composition and lighting --Mikeo 10:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support -- Chris 73 | Talk 15:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support &mdash; Nice picture. deeptrivia (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support very nice Eyesclosed 17:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support nice nice. Pschemp | Talk 07:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Pretty... Borisblue 01:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:35, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

