Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Celery Stalk

Cross section of a celery plant.

 * Reason:Excellent picture, showing Vascular tissue (Xylem and Phloem) and looks good under higher res.
 * Articles this image appears in:Vascular bundle • Vascular tissue • Celery • Lignin
 * Creator:Fir0002

--jjron (talk) 08:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 03:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose There's zero detail other than on the vascular tissue, and the DOF problems cause too many problems with that detail.  Sing  Cal  03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose I am pleasantly surprised by the quality given its from a non-Macro Tamron zoom lens. For me, there are two issues, both of which are crucial to the success of a macro shot. Firstly, DOF (Depth of Field) is not quite right. Secondly, control of the background, the large brown section in the top right is a distraction. The background could afford to be bit darker too. A good effort, I would like to see another one with a bit more attention to detail. I'm sure it could make FP. Capital photographer (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Everything's out of focus – including what the photo is attempting to demonstrate.  crassic ![ talk ] 12:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose There is nothing in focus in the entire image; the whole thing is blurry. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As said above, quality is horrible.   Spinach Dip  02:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose This photograph is taken from an artist's view rather than an informational view. Quality is also lacking.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerrittk (talk • contribs) 20:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose not at an FP level, and the blurriness is bad. Spencer  T♦C 19:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. DOF is too small; blurred. As Spencer said, not an FP level. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 13:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)