Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ChinchillaMaria.jpg

ChinchillaMaria.jpg


I think this would be a good featuerd image, it's high-res, free-licence, good quality, and I also think Maria's pose (the chinchilla) is quite.... eye-catching.


 * Nominate and support. - RHe  odt  12:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Support same reasons as nomination. - Alan Frize 12:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose, I'm afraid. Very cute photo, but not up to featured quality in my opinion. There's a very heavy shadow on the right-hand side. Also the upper piece of wood is rather distracting. Stephen Turner (Talk) 13:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Not a very striking/grabbing picture. -- light darkness (talk) 14:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose as per S. Turner. Not very focussed either. -- P199 15:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. While the pose is cute (those chinchillas can be quite adorable), it's not encyclopedic. Where's her tail? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 15:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose as the owner of a pair of chinchillas, strikes me more as snapshot quality than FPC quality. Jumping chinchillas are more fun ;) chowells 23:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose L e idiot 07:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Blurred - Adrian Pingstone
 * Oppose Nice chinchilla, but not featurable photography. The shadow, lighting, and composition leaves much to be desired.  Certainly up to article quality, but not featured picture quality. NTK 03:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Pegasus1138 Talk 02:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)