Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chocolate

[[Media:Chocolate02.jpg|Chocolate]]
A pretty good look at chocolate.
 * Support. Self Nomination --Fir0002 07:09, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. The solid chocolate looks "beaten up" with light brown dents at the edges. The brown glob of melted chocolate looks not so appetizing. Finally, the angle of the solid chocolate sticking in the melted one looks not like it is melting in progress but rather like a molten piece with a solid chunk stuck in it afterwards. Still a good image, but not quite feature material -- Chris 73 Talk
 * Ditto. Chameleon 14:32, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Strongly support. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 01:13, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak support. Does look like the slab has been inserted into the melted glob --Alphax (talk) 02:59, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment. Um, that was what was intended. I guess the idea was wrong then. --Fir0002 05:53, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. &mdash; David Remahl 05:12, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. --ScottyBoy900Q &#8734; 05:32, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The chocolate looks worn. Norman Rogers 12:12, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Good idea, but the result is far from perfect. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 09:13, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak support. This photo shows nicely, a lot about what chocolate is about. As such it is a great photo for its purpose. Visually, it is a nice strong image. It is perfect for the Chocolate article, but should it be featured? I ask others. NickP 09:02, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Cribcage 22:02, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * NOT Promoted, +4/-7. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 09:36, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

