Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin

Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin

 * Reason:A high resoultion image with an obviously significant historical value.
 * Articles in which this image appears: Yalta Conference
 * Creator:US Signal Corps


 * Support as nominator --Sir Richardson (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Reluctant oppose . Tremendous encyclopedic value, but substantial technical shortcomings.  Durova  412 20:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support with comments: please upload radical changes under a new filename while nominations are underway, or else please notify people at user talk who have already reviewed. Durova  412 00:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Durova.  Jujutacular  T · C 01:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC) (Support new picture below)
 * Oppose I'm moderately sure that I've seen better pictures of the trio. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Hey, what about this one which actually is high resolution, unlike this nom. Has a few scratches but doesn't look that bad. There is a similar color photo at Yalta Conference but it's even smaller than the nom.  Fletcher (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I would definitely support that one, it's iconic. But it might need a separate nomination. Different conference, different year.  Jujutacular  T · C 18:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Nomination reworded with new picture. Sir Richardson (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support new picture. I'd even say make this image the lead at Yalta Conference.  Jujutacular  T · C 22:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoa What happened here?? Makeemlighter (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sir Richardson changed out the picture. Perhaps this would be better closed, and restarted with the new image.  Jujutacular  T · C 23:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see that now. I agree. This should be closed and a new nomination created. At the very least, the comments from earlier should be struck. Makeemlighter (talk) 04:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: the new image was nominated previously here. --Avenue (talk) 23:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support It is one-of-a-kind image that deserves to get FP status IMO.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong support per Mbz1. Ultra-rare photo -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Resolution is nice, but Jalta-confer.jpg is in color, with much smaller resolution. I'd like an FP of this iconic shot but this isn't it. HereToHelp (talk to me) 19:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Did they HAVE colour photography back then, and, if so, was it in fact used for this image, or is the colour version just a hand-tinting for a magazine or the like? Shoemaker's Holiday talk 12:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

— Mae din \talk 20:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)