Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Churchill College, Hepworth

[[Media:Churchill College, Hepworth.jpg|Churchill College, Hepworth]]
Four Square Walk Through at night. I really like this photo and it adds to the articles Churchill College and Barbara Hepworth - Dmn[[United Kingdom| / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; ]] 00:09, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) 
 * Support - Dmn[[United Kingdom| / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; ]] 00:09, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support, but could be a bit larger -- Chris 73 Talk 03:51, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Uploaded larger version Dmn[[United Kingdom| / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; ]] 09:46, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Much better. Thanks -- Chris 73 Talk 11:13, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support -- William M. Connolley 23:23, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose until its decompressed. The image size is big (a little too big IMHO) but its very compressed. I thought for a while it was a progrssive interlace jpeg but it isn't is it? An interesting sculpture though--Fir0002 05:08, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I don't think that's JPEG compression. It looks like some sort of smoothing algorithm applied becuase the original was probably very grainy. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  15:06, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Unclear, self conciously arty without the redemption of interesting composition.  Light flare in bottom left is distracting.  The Hepworth itself might as well be a bit of technical Lego.  I dislike it intensely.  GWO 07:03, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I welcome the addition to the Hepworth article (which I've been meaning to expand for a while), but this doesn't show the statue that clearly. It's good for Churchill College though, which isn't easy to make interesting. -- Solipsist 07:55, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support - I like it, it's better than some other 'featured images' David 5000 10:04, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. --ScottyBoy900Q &#8734; 03:52, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * oppose, great concept, backlit rays and all, but just dont think that this pic nailed it. Cavebear42 17:07, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Good idea, good pic, but this smacks of Photoshopping. Is that a criteria? Note the texture of the grass in the foreground. Matthewcieplak 01:59, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I used PaintShopPro to lighten it slightly but nothing as extravagant as adding grass (I'd rather the grass wasn't there, but I don't have a tripod - to do a long exposure picture I have to rest the camera on the pavement) Dmn[[United Kingdom| / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; ]] 21:55, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I was commenting on the texture of the image - how the edges make it look more like a painting than a photograph. Maybe it was just the exposure, but the effect is still there. Hence the neutrality. Matthewcieplak 22:31, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Janderk 12:31, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Not promoted. +4/-6. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  01:37, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)