Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cocacola-5cents-1900 edit1.jpg

Coca-Cola

 * Reason:A very good image which does a good job of showing 19th century advertising.
 * Articles this image appears in:Coca-Cola, Hilda Clark
 * Creator:The Coca-Cola Company

Shall we begin again, then? MER-C 04:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Edit 2 Although it is slightly unauthentic as edit 2 vs edit 1 removes the yellowing of the image (presumably due to age) Edit 1 is just for lack of a better word ugly due to the yellow aging tint. Great work removing the white spots btw. Cat-five - talk 04:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I need to clarify to anyone that I have the cleaned up image with the border if anyone prefers it. I was leaving the nomination suspended to get some feedback, sorry for the extra work MER-C. User:victorrocha (talk) 05:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 It looks great now. I'm not sure about edit 2, though; I'd think the LOC has their scanners pretty well calibrated, and none of us has any idea how the original looked, so correcting the white balance of a painting really is a shot in the dark, IMO. It's plausible the original painter chose a warm scheme on purpose. Thegreenj 17:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 Looks more natural. Nice job on the restoration. smooth0707  (talk) 23:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 --Fir0002 04:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1  Beware  ofdog  07:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - I suppor the 1st edit, but this picture is intriguing. Clever, even. -- Meldshal   (§peak to me)  21:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Edit 1, but am pretty neutral between Edit 1 and 2. If Edit 1 is the more authentic we should go with that. Fletcher (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1, Oppose Edit 2. Warmer color-scheme seems natural enough. Without seeing the original messing with the white balance is inappropriate. Kaldari (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support either one. Just a thought: could this go on advertising also, in the history section? It talks about advertising in the early 20th century. It could probably also go on some of the other marketing articles too... great job anyway! Intothewoods29 (talk) 16:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 06:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)