Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cocoa Pods

Cocoa Pods

 * Reason:Its very encyclopedic, adds alot to the articles and the composition is just nice somehow.
 * Articles this image appears in:Chocolate, Cocoa and Cocoa pod
 * Creator:User:Medicaster40

(UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash;  Y zm o  talk  15:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Very enc. I go cuckoo for cocoa pods.  --TotoBaggins 18:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose I find the composition very distracting and undescriptive. otherwise it is fine however the composition is the most important part of a picture and this one has too many other element other than the subject. I simpily don't think this is the best we can do. -Fcb981 20:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Looks kind of 'eye catching'. 8thstar 23:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose, I think it couild be a bit tighter on the subject. -- Phoenix2  (holla) 01:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 *  Oppose Per above. Not focused on the subject. Also, that vertical leaf in the foreground is really distracting. Sorry. Jumping   cheese  02:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose per Fcb981 above. -- Thelb 4 18:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak support Yes, we could get a tighter zoom and there are blown highlights on the pods. But it's still marginally on the good side, in my opinion.--HereToHelp 20:38, 20 June 2007
 * supportI actually think it's quite a descriptive and useful image and encyclopedic Recesende 12:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Fcb, composition lacks pizazz. --Janke | Talk 13:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Sorry, I just didn't get that instant sense of quality that would come from a really clean shot. Subject isn't in the absolute center of attention, doesn't draw the eye. vlad§inger  tlk  17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Nothing special. Althepal 02:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

--Raven4x4x 09:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)