Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg

Buffalo Bill

 * Reason:Striking early 20th century portrait of a well-known historical figure. The indication of copyright in the caption is a transcription of a notation on the photo itself; the licensing on the image page indicates that the photo is in the public domain.
 * Articles this image appears in:Buffalo Bill
 * Creator:Moffett

MER-C 03:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Spikebrennan 14:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I may be a little biased because I love the quality of old style photos, but this meets the requirements of a FA in my eyes. Size is big, very little flaws, especially for a photo that old (very few water stains and dust). The DoF could be better, but technology was limited back then, and I believe that is part of the aesthetically appeal of the image. The figure is a notable figure with not many portraits, and this image is of historical importance. -Andrew c [talk] 16:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support But I am appellationly biased. Don't like the signature bottom right though, someone could take that off. --Cody.Pope 18:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Generally, since this is a work of art, and a historic image, it probably isn't the best thing to alter the image to remove the signature. It would lessen the accuracy and encyclopedic value by doing so (and in the past, commentors here at FPC have opposed such actions, as I learned first hand when I photoshopped out a copyright signature from a print, IIRC, of Abe Lincoln.)-Andrew c [talk] 22:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I strongly agree with Andrew c - removing the signature would remove too much enc value. As is, I support.  Zakolantern 17:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Interesting, never seen a picture of him before. ~ Veledan • Talk 21:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Obviously a historically significant image, and considering how old it is, it’s in great shape. —BrOnXbOmBr21 • talk • contribs • 08:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, good quality picture with historic value. -- snowolf D4   (  talk  /  @   ) 00:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)