Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Compact-Flourescent-Bulb

Compact-Flourescent-Bulb

 * Reason:This is a Beautiful, High quality image depicting a Compact Fluorescent Light Bulb. Significant because these bulbs are becoming more common every day and now play a large part in many people's lives.
 * Articles this image appears in:Compact fluorescent lamp
 * Creator:PiccoloNamek


 * Support as nominator -- The Talking Sock talk contribs 22:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose well composed, but a bit small. Circumstances should be possible to duplicate at higher resolution.  Please try again. :)  Durova Charge! 23:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I would support but it's too small so Reluctant oppose. Intothewoods29 (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Rather low enc, little or no "wow" - a larger size actually wouldn't bring out more detail... --Janke | Talk 08:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose I don't think 'wow' is a requirement. The EV is high, but the resolution is not. --Uncle Bungle (talk) 12:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Janke is right in that there is no important detail missing. I'm not convinced that this particular subject can have both EV and "wow". To me, it's a picture of a light bulb, and does exactly what it says on the tin. For those that like comparisons with existing FPs, see Image:Lens aperture side.jpg, Image:EIAJconnector2 edit.jpg and Image:Water drop animation enhanced small.gif. Light bulbs simply aren't as picturesque as matches. That's a fact of life (i.e. should be reflected in an encyclopaedic work). Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - image doesn't cover the whole object in full.--Avala (talk) 15:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose PLW's point is well taken, but I agree with Durova that the image is too small. A pic like this doesn't need to be huge, but it should meet the requirements.  I may support if it could be retaken.  Not sure I agree with Avala's point about needing to show the full object -- it would just be a monotonous white plastic cylinder.  I think it's the spiral tubing and color of the lamp that confers the most EV; this may be a rare case where I actually like it cut off.  Fletcher (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

--jjron (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)