Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Corncobs.jpg

Corn Cobs


Selfnom - I had noticed the corn article looked a little drab, and that there were great looking varieties at my local market.

Raven4x4x 13:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. - &mdash; Asbestos | Talk   (RFC)  03:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I like this! Very vibrant. -Branddobbe 18:38, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I like it too. Enochlau 04:48, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. A great variety of pretty multicoloured corn. DO'&#1048;eil 04:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I can't believe that I'm supporting a picture of corn. Very nice though. -- Lord Vold e  mort  (Dark Mark) 21:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Who'd have thought corn would look so attractive? — ceejayoz &#9733;  23:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Don't we already have one of these featured?--Deglr6328 05:38, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * That's not a criterion is it, uniqueness? Enochlau 10:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Congrats on adding a very nice photo to wikipedia. Oska 23:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - Indeed there is another, but this one is excellent in its own right. CapeCodEph 08:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Support: very colourful corn! It's... Thelb4! 20:29, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. --ScottyBoy900Q ∞ 02:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Is it genetically modified? :P --Andylkl (talk) 06:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Its a nice picture, but we already have Image:GEM corn.jpg as an FP in the same Maize article. This one shows fewer varieties of corn, is smaller and has a somewhat less interesting composition. -- Solipsist 18:28, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * ( − ) Oppose Agree with Solipsist and add that it is slightly blurred --Fir0002 02:12, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose current FPid better Circeus 15:22, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose current FP is superior Broken S 14:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - Bevo 22:19, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Glaurung 07:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC)