Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cucumber and cross section.jpg

Cucumber, whole and in longitudinal section
Voting period ends on 4 May 2013 at 12:18:48 (UTC)
 * Reason:Full EV and High Quality
 * Articles in which this image appears:Cucumber
 * FP category for this image:link to category from WP:FP that best describes the image (check categories first)
 * Creator:


 * Support as nominator --Alborzagros (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Question Is the image soft? The slight diffusion makes the image seem really bright. btw you're misisng an FP category in your nomination above. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 20:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose Licensing looks off for FP? Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * On Commons. Did we reach an agreement here? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * License is fine as the discussion was closed without a consensus but the file res in this case isnt --Muhammad (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The license is quite uselss for any purposes; but I bet it (the combined CC BY-NC, especially) attracts many friendly supports. :) J Kadavoor J e e 05:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose License, and size. — raeky  t  06:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose GFDL only images are best avoided and certainly shouldn't be promoted to featured picture status.©Geni 22:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment If the license is good enough for the Commons, then we should accept that. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Accept yes. Promote no.©Geni 09:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually that is a categorically incorrect statement: . As it stands 2/3 of the oppose !votes would be struck by the closer for invalid rationale --Fir0002 08:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't try and rule lawyer me. If we want to go down that route I'll start looking into deleting this nomination page as a copyvio.©Geni 20:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

-- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)