Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg

Cuzco, Peru

 * Reason:Worth a try.
 * Articles this image appears in:Cusco
 * Creator:User:Cacophony

(UTC)
 * Support as nominator Cacophony (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1. I would suggest improving the caption (which way are we facing, what are some notable landmarks visible in the panorama, etc.)  Spikebrennan (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1. Looks very interesting. --KFP (talk | contribs) 18:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1. Great image .Bewareofdog (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support either. Great picture. Very well stitched, and none of it is washed out. We could use more like these! Clegs (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 68.7.184.116 (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2008
 * IPs do not have suffrage, comment struck. If you wish to have your vote counted, please create an account. You also need to give a reason for your vote. You can say 'Support as per ' to mean that you support for the same reason as another voter. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Umm, you can say "Support" - it implies "Support per nom" - you can't say "Oppose" alone though. de Bivort 03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ummm, admin please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe IPs do get suffrage. And at any rate, it is considered bad Wikiquette to strikethrough other's comments. Clegs (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * IPs are generally ignored as a way to reduce the risk of sock puppeting, but their comments can certainly be considered when they are productive and contribute to a consensus. de Bivort 03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, basically as Debivort says. To quote from the top of the page: "Note however that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets." In other words the 'vote' would probably be ignored whether crossed through or not, although a valid opinion could certainly be observed; not that it's likely to make any difference here. --jjron (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit  H92110 (talk) 12:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit1. Great photo showing not only Cuzco itself, but also population density. - Darwinek (talk) 13:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit1 I like the composition, colours, lighting. And as stated above, it also illustrates the dense population of Cusco. Chris.B 14:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 Looks good to me. -- Shark face  217  02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

--jjron (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)