Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dallas

Dallas
This picture appears in the Dallas article. It is a well balanced shot from a great viewpoint. The sky in particular looks great. It appears that this shot was taken in the early morning. An excellent contribution to the Dallas article.


 * Nominate and support. - Charles2-2 19:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Grainy sky, not very sharp. Composition could also be better - alas, not stunning. --Janke | Talk 21:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - This is nice and the skyline is beautiful but ...I don't know, I'm just not wowed. It feels like this is the most mundane way possible to take an image of this subject. --Deglr6328 21:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Boring  G i zza Chat  &#169; 07:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As per Janke. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 11:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. It's cool, but not stunning. Not FP Material. -- J @  red  [T]/[+ ] 16:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px|Support]] Support Very stunning image! I uploaded another version. Alvinrune TALK 22:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Alvinrune, the sky is even worse in your edit, even though the colors are better. Editing grainy or "artifacty" images is not easy - most often the results are inferior to the original. --Janke | Talk 06:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

--PS2pcGAMER (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, It would just be any other picture to me, but I really like how that building is so reflective. I especailly like the second, artifacts or not.--Lewk_of_Serthic contrib talk 04:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Poor composition and relatively uninteresting.  —This unsigned comment was added by 65.182.51.67 (talk • contribs).
 * Support: looks great to me! --Hetar 07:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Nothing spectacular. Canuck89 08:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)