Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Detaching drop

Detaching drop


Used in the article Drop (liquid). The picture demonstrates the details of a drop's detachment.
 * Nominate (self-nomination) and support Roger McLassus 08:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose I don't like the stark shadows nor the mottled background. If you can make a better one, with a plain background (lit with a separate flash and/or reflector, to get rid of the shadows), I'll support that. Even better would be to have a series of three or four pictures - hey, why don't you make a GIF animation with, say 8 to 10 frames? I'm sure such an image would be almost unanimously supported... --Janke | Talk 09:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I like mine better :-) [[Image:Dripping faucet 1.jpg|30px]][[Image:Dripping faucet 2.jpg|30px]], just shot half an hour ago. --Dschwen 14:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, Your background is better, but Roger's pics don't have ugly soap and lime stains on the faucet... ;-) Seriously, would either of you care to make a series of shots into an animated gif? (Not an .ogg, I don't think those will show in-line with the article text, and some people don't even have the right plug-ins...) You'd have to shoot quite a few pics to get a coherent, well spaced, series. That would be interesting, and an excellent addition to Wikipedia. --Janke | Talk 14:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * That is easier said than done. Both pictures (I believe) show not the images of the same drop detaching, but entirely different drops (correct me if I'm wrong Roger). To shoot an animation you'd need a camera with a framerate upwards of 100fps. I can ask at our non-linear dynamics lab... --Dschwen 14:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No, actually, you don't have to have a special camera! A repetitive phenomenon like this can be recorded "in motion" with a still camera! It's a bit tricky to get the exact timing for the different frames (yes, different drops, but they all look the same), but it is entirely possible - especially if you shoot a lot of them. I just thought I'd present you with the challenge ;-) --Janke | Talk 20:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Good idea, that's also how they capture 4d CTs of human hearts, but my faucet was dripping not too uniformly. I was thinking of getting a strobe light and pan the camera with the shutter open. Next week earliest. --Dschwen 21:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment as to the adding significantly to the article, has anyone looked at the Drop (liquid) page? It is a stub, heavily overloaded with pics, with the nominee taking up 50% screen real estate as a 500px monster (inserted into the article this morning to qualify for nomination). In that way, yes, it is contributing significantly. --Dschwen 14:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I'd prefer another background, but the drops themselves are great. Hein 22:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Interesting, and shows features of water well, but I don't like the background. enochlau (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Water drop animation.gif|thumb|100px|Water drop animation]]Not a vote but since there was a demand for a water drop animation, AND i got a new camera recently, i took about 300 pics of my sink. Here is the result. Looks pretty good. Small improvements would be the gif color error on the right between the tiles, and maybe show the first image a little bit longer than the others. The full scale 1944 x 2592 image was 50 MB, so I scaled it down to 400x640. Best regards -- Chris 73 | Talk 21:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, do you want to nominate that for FPC? If so, you might want to put it in a separate section so it gets the proper scrutiny. enochlau (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Great! Throwing out the challenge worked! ;-) Will Roger or Dschwen make an attempt, too? Please do nominate yours separately, Chris! One thing you could do: remove a frame or two, now the drop seems to slow down just as it has detached... --Janke | Talk 08:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I made an attempt too (2.5 sec avi), but my faucet has an erratic drop pattern and the cycles do not match very well. Watch the video to see what I mean. I'll try another faucet tomorrow. --Dschwen 22:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Great work! I'd certainly support it if it was nominated! --Dschwen 11:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, if you insist, here it goes: Featured picture candidates/Water drop animation. I made it a bit larger and also adjusted the time intervals between the pics to match physics. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - shadows, again. :-) Flcelloguy (A note? ) 15:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * ( − ) Oppose Animation is much better IMO --Fir0002 00:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support both Briseis 14:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Kessa Ligerro 07:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support It took me a while to reflect. But in spite of the dark shadows I now decided to support the picture because of the brilliant drops. Calderwood 07:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Mayamaxima 08:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

