Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Diepenbeek

Diepenbeek



 * This picture is in the article Diepenbeek; it does not say who is the author. The picture is visually astounding, with Crepuscular rays shining through the trees. This is a featured picture at the commons as well.
 * Commons:User:Bios is the author.  howch e  ng   {chat} 20:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Nominate and Support | A ndonic O   Talk  18:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Pretty, but it could be anywhere. Pretty pictures are enough for commons, but what is this telling us? As the caption itself says, this isn't Diepenbeek.Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 18:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Support It's not technically perfect, but I believe beauty has a place in Wikipedia. - Alvesgaspar 18:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Nice, but not encyclopedic. Our criteria are different from the ones on Commons. --Janke | Talk 18:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Just looks like a park.  howch e  ng   {chat} 20:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I am quite suprised it is a Commons FP. The quality is rather bad and the highlights are clearly blown. Also, the subject is quite undistinctive. Nautica Shad e  s  21:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose A lovely picture but just not special enough - Adrian Pingstone 08:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. It's very nice looking, but it lacks a clear subject. -- Tewy  21:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Good picture, not good enough for featured status though. Hello32020 02:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, when it comes to pictures you must reflect your life upon them if you can then it is a good pic, if you can't then not so great. A very good picture.--- S e  adog  21:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 17:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)