Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dust bowl, Texas

Dust bowl, Texas
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024  at 13:02:53 (UTC)
 * Reason:great historical picture by a notable photographer, FP on Commons
 * Articles in which this image appears:Dust Bowl, Great bison belt, Negative (photography)
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/History/USA History
 * Creator:Arthur Rothstein, restored and uploaded by Christoph Braun


 * Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support - Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oppose Classic photo, but dust storm images in the dust bowl article have much more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment – It has EV, for the era, in displaying the side effects in Great bison belt. there is 'retouched template' plus a 'compressed template' on the file page, so is this a contrast adjusted version of the original Here? If yes, then why the heavy adjustment? Or is this a direct scan of an old print Here? If it's a direct scan (unadjusted) of an old print or negative, then I support. Bammesk (talk) 00:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not made from the positive, but it seems the levels were adjusted to match it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yann, I did a search and found This print, the link includes both sides. It looks like an authentic print. It matches the negative. I don't quite understand the darker version, the nom version, it looks like a night time (or evening) photo. I wonder whether the darker nom version was the dominant version published (or used) at the time. The lighter version (the negative) looks more realistic. But if the darker version was the dominant print at the time, then Ok, I would support it. Bammesk (talk) 04:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for finding this. I will restored it. Yann (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 15:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)