Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/EOS 5D Mark II

Canon 5D Mark II
Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2011 at 10:46:33 (UTC)
 * Reason:Excellent quality image, a lot higher than some of our other studio FP's. Give's accurate representation and is lead image.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II, List_of_Canon_products
 * FP category for this image:Photographic_techniques,_terms,_and_equipment
 * Creator:Charles Lanteigne


 * Support as nominator -- JFitch  (talk)  10:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support-- For details & quality. Joydeep (talk) 12:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support -- Amazing quality, high resolution. I'm a little iffy on the crop, but not enough to make this a weak support. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Prefer ALT now that it's up. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Edit1 uploaded - bigger canvas size. --jjron (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Edit1. Good photo spoiled by intolerably tight crop; edit corrects this issue. --jjron (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Look at in some context. Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II for example and It's clear why it's cropped so tight. It works for that page imo. JFitch   (talk)  11:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree. I edited it after checking it on the article page (it's pretty immaterial what it looks like here after all). It's too tight. You're free to oppose the edit, but Closer please note that my support is only for the Edit. --jjron (talk) 13:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I can support both, the quality is still there and there is certainly no reason to oppose. Your perfectly right in that it looks better in thumbnail. My only point was that on the 5Dii page it looks fine filling the area as it does, and as that is the image's prime use, isn't that what's important? JFitch   (talk)  11:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit I was thinking the same thing as jjron before. JJ Harrison (talk) 00:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit per image quality (have no idea about abundance of FPs on this topic). Yes, the crop of the original is too tight even for me (who crops too tight for thumbnail purposes :). Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit per other comments. Pinetalk 07:44, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit the crop for the original is way too tight, and it looked awful even in the infobox. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 07:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Support edit --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC) P.S. Support for the camera too ;-)
 * Support edit -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)