Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eskimo Nebula

Eskimo Nebula

 * Reason:I was looking up Hubble images in google and came upon with this very fascinating image.It is pleasing to the eye and adds value to the article.
 * Articles this image appears in:Eskimo Nebula
 * Creator:NASA and ESA


 * Support as nominator &mdash; Bewareofdog 00:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose The image is not sharp and I, for one, am getting awfully tired of the astronomy pictures.  Pretty soon we can just link directly to Space.com Image of the day. Cacophony 00:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As for there being so many, the astronomy section has been neglected, I have uploaded at least 50 Hubble images myself, free images that have been available for years. A good picture is a good picture and it doesn't matter when it is nominated,  or what category it falls under.Chris H 01:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

MER-C 09:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * weak support Its a good image but there are a few "great" images of planetary nebulae.Chris H 01:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose I have just enough imagination to see how cool the subject is, but the image is inferior to many astronomy pics. I appreciate you uploading all of them, but the better ones have raised the bar well beyond this.--HereToHelp 02:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, not a particularly astounding photograph. -- Phoenix  03:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The nebula is clearly an amazing subject, but this image is not up there in quality with other featured pics on astronomy subjects. I'd be happy to support something sharp. - Mgm|(talk) 10:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - fascinating image, but I have to say that the quality is A laisser désirer... --Booksworm Talk to me! 14:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Very Weak Oppose- Great image but just a little too blurry -- St.daniel Talk 23:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Immense  E l e c t r i c m o o s e - Electrifying  talk 18:53, 5 May 2006 16:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose I personally like this imge, but technically I would say it isn't worthy of being featured. The resolution is quite low and it is very out of focus. SquareShot97 20:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)